ETHICAL NEUTRALITY & THE FALL FROM HUMAN GRACES, Author - Dr. Jernail Singh Anand
ETHICAL NEUTRALITY & THE FALL FROM HUMAN GRACES
Dr.
Jernail Singh Anand
We have emerged
from the past throwing off superstition and
the stranglehold of religion which served as boobytraps to obstruct
man’s march into modernity. However,
while we have entered the shining horizons of scientific advancement, and are
looking over the AI into further areas of deep research, it is alarming to see
how man is conceding more and more space to the machines. We must ask this
question to ourselves: What is our destination? Shall our science ever succeed
in trapping death? Shall we ever be able to demystify the process of birth and
death? Physically, and clinically, science can explain the phenomenon of birth
and death, but the question remains : what dies with the body? And what comes
to life with the birth of a child? These are eternal questions which have foxed
human intelligence, artificial or otherwise.
The fall of
mankind in the Eden proved to be a blessing in disguise. The pursuit of
knowledge has given us this great civilization.
But all is not well with the human tribe. Perhaps, in our euphoria about
technological progression, we forget that knowledge has devilish roots. It was
Satan who had tempted the mother of mankind. The results are obvious. In these
times of great advances of science and technology, we are witnessing another
fall, and now it is the fall from human graces.
The Second Fall:
The Fall from Human Graces
There are
obviously two forces which are responsible for the second fall of mankind. Man can be healthier and might be living
longer and more comfortably than before. But the subject of real worry is his emotional
disintegration. His mindscape is a web
of confusions, deprivations and longings. He has been brought to this alarming
situation by the flurry of physical comforts, the innovations, and the power
and luxury which has been placed at his disposal in the name of modernity and
advancement. Now, AI, which promises to solve his problems, is itself viewed as
a fearsome monster for the human kind, because there are no ways to restrict
this menacing development of technology.
Ethical Neutrality
of Literature
The second issue
relates to the moral support which was eminently available to mankind in the
previous ages, and it was the support of literature. With the progression of civilization, there is no dearth of literary writings.
Amazon is flooded with books and writers, competitions and awards. But, we have
not been able to produce literature whose moral intensity matches the masters
like Shakespeare and Milton. No doubt,
there have been democratization of the creative process, but the progression of
civilization has diluted the moral
content of previous centuries, and there is visible erosion of the ethical in the contemporary literature. The prevailing
ideas of aestheticism, and moral
neutrality of the author restrict him from taking a moral stand, because he is
then accused of preaching or pontificating.
The idea of
freedom in matters of literary expression has been dragged to such an extent,
that the reader is accorded the freedom
to reconstruct his own text, which makes him a creator in his own right. The movements like Art for Art’s Sake further
removed the burden of moral necessity from the shoulders of the artists.
Moreover, the number of people who are writing about literature, has increased manifold over those who are
actually creating literature. The
creative writer too stops short of making any direct assertions because being
explicit in areas of morality is treated as a lower art. Artists create their art works, and leave it
to the masses to understand the message in their own way. It can be defended in many ways, except one.
A writer has a cosmic responsibility to create in order to ensure the wellbeing
of the universe. And what he says, he should
have so much power over his words that they cannot be hijacked or forced to
mean anything else.
Moral Ambiguity of
Literature
I think this tendency of the literary world, this
moral ambiguity and not taking a particular moral stand, and saying things in
an abstract manner, so that it allows the people to come to their own
conclusions, which finally means freedom
to interpret, needs to be re-evaluated. If we compare the moral intensity of
the literature of Shakespeare’s time, through Milton, Donne and William
Wordsworth, we find that our century has more poetry, prose, fiction and non-fiction, and it is
loaded with much more critical mass, yet, we are far behind them, so far as
undeclared moral commitment of the writer is concerned. I think this is one
reason why the world has tumbled into moral chaos.
If we wish to put
brakes on the free fall of human civilization into insanity, we need to make
literature more morally pronounced. Let every writing, creative or critical, or
even scholarly works, clearly mention
what moral purpose it serves. I call it ‘ethiquettes’. We will have to come out openly, and while
writing, promote ethical living. Otherwise, our ethical neutrality will push
the civilization further and deeper into moral anarchy and emotional bankruptcy.
DR JERNAIL S ANAND
Dr. Jernail S. Anand, with 200 books to his credit [20 epics] is a Chandigarh-based polymath, and a vital architect of the 21st century ethical literature whose seminal work ‘Lustus: The Prince of Darkness’ challenges the moral complacency of our era. Founding President of the International Academy of Ethics, and Laureate of Charter of Morava [Serbia], Seneca [Italy], Franz Kafka [Germany, Ukraine, Czech Rep] and Maxim Gorky [Russia], his name is inscribed on the Poets’ Rock in Serbia. He is an Honorary Member of the Serbian Writers Association, Belgrade. Anand has built a poetics that unites ethics, Vedic spirituality, social critique, and the philosophy of meaning. Anand presents an articulated perspective on poetry as an instrument of planetary consciousness. A moral philosopher, professor, and international speaker, Anand has devoted much of his research to the ethical dimension of language, to the responsibility of the individual within a globalised society, and to the relationship between matter, consciousness, and transcendence.
